Download e-book for kindle: Science (Vol. 309, No. 5736, August 2005) by

Read Online or Download Science (Vol. 309, No. 5736, August 2005) PDF

Similar science books

Get How Slow Can you Waterski?: and other puzzling questions PDF

Whilst the powers that be lowered the rate restrict on Lake Windermere to ten knots, waterskiers complained that their activity used to be now thoroughly scuppered. So simply how gradual are you able to waterski ahead of you begin to sink underneath the waves?

And, whereas we're approximately it, how lengthy are you able to continue to exist in a freezer? What are the possibilities of being struck by way of lightning in mattress? And why is it so esay to raed wrods eevn wehn the lteetrs are mdduled up?

Everyday existence can pose a few mind-boggling questions - yet the place do you discover the solutions? The Guardian's well known 'This Week' column has been taking a look into the technological know-how at the back of the inside track for 3 years, and the way sluggish are you able to Waterski? attracts jointly a variety of the main imaginitive questions and the main brilliant solutions. If you've ever puzzled what makes a planet a planet, why submarines preserve bumping into issues or perhaps if it's suitable for eating dust, How gradual are you able to Waterski? will end up impossible to resist - and enlightening - reading.

Download PDF by Mitch Earleywine: Mind-Altering Drugs: The Science of Subjective Experience

A minimum of one in all each 3 american citizens has used a bootleg drug. medications allure enormous recognition in technology, laws, and the media. still, many of us strengthen attitudes approximately medicinal drugs and drug clients in line with restricted info. Researchers usually locate themselves divided into camps in keeping with the drug they research most of the time, which limits their skill to profit from vital paintings performed on different medications.

Read e-book online Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2000: 25th PDF

This booklet constitutes the refereed lawsuits of the twenty fifth overseas Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of laptop technology, MFCS 2000, held in Bratislava/Slovakia in August/September 2000. The fifty seven revised complete papers offered including 8 invited papers have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from a complete of 147 submissions.

Extra resources for Science (Vol. 309, No. 5736, August 2005)

Example text

Woolley himself suggested that the seal and weapons were gifts from the woman’s husband. Another theory is that the true owner of the seal, a male, was buried in a mud-brick shaft above the stone tomb. But McCaffrey notes that the materials in that shaft are low quality and lack weapons, and that no other royal tomb is constructed of mud brick. In fact, the remains in the mudbrick shaft, identified by Woolley as male, were wrapped in women’s clothing with feminine jewelry. Unfortunately, those bones also were discarded.

But it’s still high for many projects, including medical uses such as checking the genomes of individuals. Both groups save money by eliminating the need for bacteria and miniaturizing the process wherever possible. In lieu of bacteria, they attach DNA to aqueous beads encased in oil where chemical reactions copy the DNA to make the necessary amount. S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute in Walnut Creek, Califor- fluorescent colors, one each to a particular base, to distinguish the bases.

Woolley couldn’t tell the difference between a man, a woman, or a monkey,” he says. McCaffrey counters that Woolley was competent enough to identify correctly the genders of the dozen skeletons that still exist. Philologists, meanwhile, note that although “lugal” is technically a gender-free term, there is the counterpart term “eresh,” which traditionally is translated as female consort to a male ruler. E W S F O C U S Without a skeleton, scholars may never definitively sort out the mysteries of tomb 1054.

Download PDF sample

Science (Vol. 309, No. 5736, August 2005)

by Mark

Rated 4.27 of 5 – based on 21 votes