The heavily contested presidential election of 2000, which many analysts felt used to be made up our minds via electorate for the fairway get together, solid a focus on a structural contradiction of yankee politics. Critics charged that eco-friendly get together electorate inadvertently contributed to the election of a conservative Republican president simply because they selected to "vote their judgment of right and wrong" instead of "choose among evils." yet why this number of ? Is the two-party process of Democrats and Republicans an immutable and fundamental point of our democracy? Lisa Disch keeps that it's not. there's no constitutional warrant for 2 events, and winner-take-all elections don't need to set 3rd events as much as fail. She argues that the two-party procedure as we all know it dates in simple terms to the 20 th century and that it thwarts democracy by means of losing the votes and silencing the voices of dissenters.
The Tyranny of the Two-Party process reexamines a as soon as well known nineteenth-century procedure known as fusion, during which a dominant-party candidate ran at the ballots of either the verified get together and a 3rd get together. within the 19th century fusion made attainable anything that many voters want have been attainable this day: to sign in a protest vote that counts and that may not throw the election to the institution candidate they least favor. The e-book concludes through reading the 2000 presidential election as an item lesson within the tyranny of the two-party approach and with feedback for vote casting experiments to stimulate participation and make American democracy attentive to a broader diversity of citizens.